Hell yeah it looks better than Killzone 2. Oh the irony...Killzone 2 is the one that looks "soft" and uses massive amounts of bloom. Quit trying to troll 360 articles, especially if you are going to fail that bad at it.
ah ha ha ha look at all the ps3 fanboys pretending to not be impressed. "oh it looks a little better than Halo 3" LMAO you guys aren't fooling anybody. Halo Reach looks epic and the graphics are second to none.
This was cgi silly fanboy. The Halo Reach footage was in engine and looks insane. Mass Effect 2 is looking really sharp though.
wow that trailer was incredible and I have a feeling this might be my 2010 goty. But who knows ..there are so many other good games coming out next year. Halo Reach looked crazy good and I also can't wait for Dead Space 2 and Alan Wake to name a few.
No, calling out idiots doesn't make one an idiot. Acting like an idiot is what makes one an idiot. People calling L4D2 an expansion are acting like idiots. Ergo...
@LastPlaceConsole
Same difference, right?
----
L4D2 isn't an expansion anymore than 90% of sequels are "expansions". Can anybody please define what is an expansion and what is a legitimate sequel? I see the same thing in L4D2 as I see in any sequel: new gameplay elements, new environments, new narrative, etc.
Oh look, another delusional Sony fantard. The 360 has had loads of great games over the years. If you think that Halo and Gears is all that the 360 is about you are truly lost in your own fanboy fantasy land.
What is it with you guys?...
Yes, PS3 fanboys tend to be mental. Flat out delusional, in fact.
Funny, just last night I was comparing Assassin's Creed 2 and Uncharted 2 (just for fun, because I was so impressed with how good AC2 looked) and I felt Uncharted 2 was more polished, but otherwise they were pretty close.
Uncharted 2 looks as good as it does mostly because of Naught Dog's talent--their artists, programmers and the techniques they use--not because the PS3 is a more powerful console. If it were the more powerful console it would show it in more than just a couple ...
I've had my 360 since launch and I have really enjoyed owning it. Great online service, great games, nice controller...keep it up Microsoft. 2010 looks like an even better year for the 360.
Sony came off of two highly successful console generations and almost nobody thought the 360 stood a chance against the PS3, yet here it is still with a several million unit lead over the PS3. None of the consoles have been trouble free, but all in all I'd say the 360 has done very well.
Yeah, sure, that's why most multiplatform games are inferior on the PS3.
IF it ever did come to the PS3, expect to get the inferior version. Just sayin'.
I have both consoles and I couldn't care less if it comes to the PS3. Even if it did, which is unlikely, I won't care because I will have long since played it on my 360.
I absolutely loved Mass Effect and part deux has me more excited than practically anything else out there.
Xeoset and Lowcarb are correct, the 360 does have the most games.
Using Metacritic (it isn't a 100% complete listing, but it's close enough) we see 753 games listed for the 360, while the PS3 lists 434 games and the Wii lists 515. So, Xeoset was fully correct. Nothing to debate there.
As far as the oft-chanted PS3 fanboy mantra claiming the PS3 has more quality...well, that is subjective, now isn't it? But ok, let's look at the consensus. According to the aggrega...
If anything, people that paid $600 for a console with a limited game selection got @ss raped. However, if those people are happy with their purchase I'm not actually saying they got ripped off, I'm just pointing out your absolute hypocrisy.
You ps3 fans are such nerds. All you know how to do is sit on the internet all day insulting people and talking nonsense.
Yes, be very scared of the big bad boogey man...Microsoft! He is out to get you, but luckily the saintly Sony is there to wrap you up in a warm blanket and protect you from all the evil in the world. Ha ha ha..
That doesn't even make sense, nerd.
Quote- "I prefer the developers to speak through their games rather than their mouths."-
What the hell is your point? All devs that actually make games for both systems have shown that their 360 games are equal or better than their ps3 versions.
Devs like Naughty Dog haven't made a game for the 360 so that does not really show anything there. We'll never really know what kind of results they could get on the 360, but we do know that all of the devs that a...
Funny how I remember a lot of PS3 fanboys defending Heavenly Sword even though it only had like a 6 hour single player and no co-op or multiplayer modes at all. Those PS3 fans said that it didn't matter because it was a great game and many of them were saying that they would rather have a short, excellent game than a long, mediocre game.
Well, this game is an excellent game. The campaign is a little on the short side but it doesn't feel drastically shorter than games like the f...
I think it is laughable how you ps3 fanboys think you can just decide what something is worth. Here's a hint: you guys aren't the final judge on such things. Every person is going to decide for themselves.
It's like if somebody plays Ratchet & Clank (or any PS3 game) and decides that they don't like it that much and then goes on the forums and acts like they can just tell everybody that the game isn't worth the asking price. Stupid.
Obviously you can give you...
The only ones crying are a bunch of ps3 fanbabies that flood every Halo Reach article because it makes them nervous. Halo Reach kills Killzone 2 in the graphics department. so get over it.